The House of Representatives on Thursday passed through third and final reading a constitutional amendment bill seeking to establish state police, marking a major step in one of Nigeria’s most far-reaching security reform efforts since the return to democratic rule in 1999.
The bill scaled through after the House adopted the report of the Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution, chaired by Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu.
Out of the 290 lawmakers present at plenary, 289 voted in support of the proposal, while only one member voted against it.
With the title, ‘Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026,’ the legislation seeks to alter the 1999 Constitution (as amended) to provide a legal framework for the establishment and operation of state police services across the federation.
The bill empowers the National Assembly to prescribe the structure, organisation, administration and powers of the Federal Police, while setting minimum standards for the establishment and operation of state police forces.
It provides that no state police formation can commence operations unless it is created through legislation passed by the relevant State House of Assembly and certified as complying with national standards prescribed by the National Assembly.
Until a state police force becomes operational, the Federal Police will continue to exercise policing powers and responsibilities within the affected state.
The proposal also seeks to redefine the relationship between federal and state policing authorities by limiting federal intervention in state security affairs to specific circumstances.
Under the bill, the Federal Police may intervene where there is a complete breakdown of law and order that a state police force is unable to contain, where a governor formally requests intervention, or where a state police organisation becomes inoperative because of administrative, financial or other operational challenges.
The amendment further recognises the Federal Capital Territory as falling under the territorial jurisdiction of the Federal Police.
The legislation introduces significant changes to the appointment and command structure of policing institutions.
Under the proposed amendment to Section 215 of the Constitution, the Inspector-General of Police would be appointed by the President on the advice of the Nigeria Police Council from among serving members of the Federal Police, subject to confirmation by the National Assembly.
Similarly, State Commissioners of Police would be appointed by governors on the advice of the Nigeria Police Council from among serving officers of the respective state police services, subject to confirmation by State Houses of Assembly.
Governors would also be empowered to issue lawful directives to State Commissioners of Police on matters relating to public safety and the maintenance of law and order.
However, where a commissioner considers such directives unlawful or inconsistent with accepted policing standards, the matter may be referred to the Nigeria Police Council, whose decision would be final.
The passage of the bill by the House is expected to reignite debate over the merits and risks of decentralised policing, including issues of funding, operational control, accountability and safeguards against political abuse.
If eventually approved by the Senate and endorsed by at least two-thirds of State Houses of Assembly before receiving presidential assent, the amendment would fundamentally alter Nigeria’s policing architecture and introduce a multi-layered law enforcement structure aimed at addressing local security challenges more effectively.
The voting process was preceded by a brief controversy over the timing of the consideration of the Constitution Review Committee’s report.
Malam Bashir Usman (ADC, Kaduna) objected to the consideration of the report, arguing that members received the document too late to adequately study its contents.
Usman, who represents Birnin Gwari/Giwa Federal Constituency, an area severely affected by banditry and kidnapping, questioned the urgency of debating major security reforms without sufficient scrutiny.
