"Making millions of dollars posting absolute lies": Candace Owens' net worth draws attention after Laura Loomer demands demonetization over Charlie Kirk claims

Laura Loomer has called for Candace Owens to be demonetized, accusing her of profiting from content about Charlie Kirk’s death and allegedly harassing his family. Owens rejected the criticism and hit back at Loomer on X. The dispute comes amid Owens’ ongoing public feud with Ben Shapiro and Andrew Kolvet, who have also criticized her commentary surrounding Kirk’s death and the claims she has continued to promote.

Conservative commentators Candace Owens and Laura Loomer have traded fresh words in a public spat that’s become yet another chapter in the ongoing row over the death of Charlie Kirk. The latest feud began after Owens shared a new animated video on X detailing the events leading up to Kirk’s death, prompting Loomer to accuse the commentator of profiting off controversial claims. Owens quickly fired back, escalating an already bitter feud that has drawn several prominent conservative figures.

Candace Owens faces criticism from Laura Loomer as demonetization demand sparks debate

The latest controversy began after Candace Owens posted an animated video on X that discussed her interpretation of the events surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death. Owens has previously shared a number of theories and opinions related to the shooting, which have generated significant attention and criticism online.Reacting to the video, Laura Loomer publicly argued that Owens should no longer be able to earn revenue from such content. Sharing Owens’ post, Loomer wrote:“Candace Owens should be demonetized. She should not be allowed to make money off of this harassment of Charlie Kirk’s family. It’s outrageous that YouTube allows her to make millions of dollars posting absolute lies and defamation. She is truly demented and I can’t wait to see the day she’s held accountable.”Loomer’s remarks reflect her opinion regarding Owens’ content. The allegations have not been established as fact.Owens responded directly to Loomer’s criticism, saying the activist should be “institutionalized (again).” She also claimed Loomer should “not be allowed to walk around freely” and described her as “a risk to the President.”The latest exchange has intensified an already public disagreement between the two commentators, with supporters on both sides weighing in across social media.Public interest has also turned toward Owens’ finances amid the controversy. According to Celebrity Net Worth, Candace Owens has an estimated net worth of $5 million. The estimate has not been independently verified.Owens built her public profile during the 2010s through political commentary on YouTube and other social media platforms. She has also worked with organizations including Turning Point USA and The Daily Wire. Before entering political media, Owens worked as an intern at Vogue, later joining a private equity firm before launching several business ventures that eventually led to her online career.

Candace Owens’ dispute with Ben Shapiro and Andrew Kolvet continues

The disagreement with Loomer comes as Owens remains involved in a separate public feud with Daily Wire co-founder Ben Shapiro and Andrew Kolvet.On Thursday, Owens shared screenshots that she claimed showed Charlie Kirk expressing negative opinions about Shapiro. Responding publicly, Shapiro dismissed the focus on personal relationships and criticized Owens for her continued commentary surrounding Kirk’s death.He wrote:“See, here’s the thing: I don’t really care about personal drama. I’ve said repeatedly that Charlie and I weren’t best friends. Maybe you were best friends with Charlie. Maybe not. I don’t know, nor do I care. For ten months, you’ve been slandering Charlie’s wife, his friends, and all of the people he worked with. You’re working to acquit his murderer.”Shapiro continued:“You’re spreading conspiratorial poison for cash. That’s something anyone of decency should condemn. The fact that so many are unwilling to do so is demonstrative of widespread cowardice, stupidity, wickedness…or all three.”Owens later redirected attention toward Andrew Kolvet, arguing that Shapiro had at least acknowledged the nature of his relationship with Kirk.She posted:“Consider how positively insane it is that Ben Shapiro is willing to tell the truth, or at least doesn’t deny the truth about his relationship with Charlie but @AndrewKolvet lies, explicitly and seeks to invert reality. Andrew was Charlie’s Judas.”The exchange highlights the deep divisions that continue to surround discussions of Charlie Kirk’s death, with prominent conservative voices publicly challenging one another while audiences closely follow each new development.