PFIPC Scandal: Atiku Issues Seven-Day Ultimatum To Tinubu To Order Independent Probe

Former Vice President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, has given President Bola Tinubu a seven-day ultimatum to order what he described as a transparent, comprehensive and independent investigation into the controversy surrounding the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC).

Atiku warned that failure to initiate the probe would reinforce public suspicion that influential figures within the government may have benefited from the alleged fraud and that Nigerians seeking public sector appointments may have fallen victim to a racket operating under official protection.

The former vice president’s demand follows growing controversy over the purported government agency after the Presidency insisted the PFIPC was not a legitimate federal institution and described its alleged Director-General, Adeniyi Adeyemi, as an impostor currently facing criminal prosecution over allegations of forgery and impersonation.

In a statement issued on Friday by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, Atiku said the matter had gone beyond allegations against one individual and now raised serious concerns about the credibility of government institutions and oversight mechanisms.

He argued that the Presidency’s explanation had failed to address critical questions surrounding the operations of the purported agency.

“If the government wants Nigerians to believe that one man single-handedly created an office for himself, secured office space within a government facility, held meetings with foreign embassy delegations, paid courtesy visits to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, processed staff salaries through official channels, allegedly operated institutional accounts, and carried on all these activities without the knowledge, approval, negligence or collaboration of anyone within government; then that narrative raises even more troubling questions than it answers.

“At this point, the story looks less like a clean explanation and more like an attempt to isolate one man after an internal arrangement went sour. If Mr Adeniyi Adeyemi committed fraud, he must face the law. But the bigger question is this: what kind of government system allows such an elaborate operation to pass through budgetary, administrative, security and institutional channels without detection?

“Haba! Nigerians cannot be asked to swallow such a story whole,” the statement read.

According to Atiku, the issue was no longer centred on the conduct of one individual but on the institutional processes that allegedly recognised and facilitated the operations of an agency the Presidency insists never existed.

He questioned how the purported agency allegedly secured office accommodation, processed official transactions and interacted with government institutions if it had no legal basis.

“Was it his character that secured budgetary allocations for a supposedly fictitious office? Was it his antecedents that got him office space within a government facility? Was it his dubious nature that enabled him to hold meetings with foreign delegations, legislators and public officials, with some of those engagements reportedly covered by the media? Was it his character that opened or operated official financial channels for the agency?

“At some point, we must separate an individual’s alleged conduct from the institutional systems that either enabled it or failed to detect it,” he said.

Atiku also referred to reports that the PFIPC appeared in the 2026 Appropriation Act with a multi-billion naira allocation and that the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation allegedly approved the recruitment of more than 300 personnel into the agency.

He argued that such developments could not be dismissed as mere administrative errors.

“These developments cannot be dismissed as administrative oversights. Budget preparation is a structured process involving ministries, departments, agencies, the Budget Office, the National Assembly and ultimately presidential assent. Recruitment into the Federal Civil Service is also governed by manpower planning, establishment approvals, financial implications, grade-level classifications and institutional clearances. These things do not happen by accident.

“It stretches credibility beyond reasonable limits to suggest that an agency described as entirely fictitious could appear in official budget documents, reportedly obtain recruitment approval for hundreds of personnel, secure official space, interact with state institutions and foreign missions, and yet have no enablers within government,” he stated.

The former vice president said fresh claims by Adeyemi, who has denied allegations of forgery and maintained that his appointment was genuine, further underscored the need for an independent investigation.

“Whether his claims are true or false is not for the Presidency to determine through press statements. That is precisely why Nigeria needs an independent investigation. Let the facts speak. Let every document be examined. Let every approval be traced. Let every official who acted, neglected a duty, or enabled this scandal be identified and held accountable,” he added.

Atiku maintained that the controversy now extends beyond one individual and touches on the integrity of Nigeria’s budgeting process, the credibility of the Federal Civil Service and the accountability of the Presidency.

“The President must order a comprehensive, independent investigation immediately. Anything short of that will amount to complicity by silence,” he said.

The PFIPC controversy has dominated public discourse in recent days following conflicting claims over the existence of the agency.

While the Presidency maintains that no such government body exists and accuses Adeyemi of forging his appointment documents, Adeyemi has rejected the allegations, insisting that he was lawfully appointed and possesses valid official documents.

The Presidency has also disclosed that Adeyemi and two others are standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja on charges bordering on conspiracy, forgery and impersonation, with the matter scheduled for hearing later this month.