The Federal Ministry of Education has raised fresh concerns over the credibility of some outstanding West African Examinations Council (WAEC) results when the Minister of State for Education, Professor Suwaiba Saidu Ahmad, said some of the widely celebrated nine-A results are products of examination malpractice.
Ahmad’s position has brought renewed attention to a long-standing concern among teachers, parents, and education stakeholders: whether impressive grades in public examinations consistently reflect the knowledge and ability of the candidates who obtain them.
According to the minister, the appearance of exceptional results cannot, on its own, be treated as evidence of academic mastery where malpractice has influenced the examination process.
The concern is significant because WAEC grades are used to assess students’ readiness for further education and other academic opportunities. Where results are obtained through dishonest means, the certificate may present an ability that the holder does not possess.
The issue has also generated concern about the changing meaning attached to examination grades. In previous decades, securing five credits, particularly with English Language and Mathematics, was regarded as a major academic achievement. Students often prepared through sustained study, repeated practice, and past examination papers.
The minister, however, contrasts that experience with the increasing prominence of exceptional grades, including candidates recording distinctions across almost every subject.
It also identifies examination malpractice as a collective problem involving different actors within the education system. Parents who prioritise results over learning, schools that tolerate dishonest practices, examination officials who compromise their responsibilities, and students who seek shortcuts all contribute to the problem, according to the commentary.
The consequences extend beyond the examination hall.
Ahmad warned that a candidate who obtains a high grade without acquiring the corresponding knowledge may later struggle when required to apply that knowledge in university, professional training, or the workplace. A certificate can demonstrate academic performance, but it cannot compensate for an absence of competence.
The concern also touches on the credibility of other major examinations. The minister points to unusual increases in some Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) scores and the repeated emergence of examination centres associated with unusually high numbers of distinctions as issues requiring scrutiny.
She calls for greater investment in examination bodies, proper remuneration for invigilators, and tougher action against those who facilitate malpractice.
Students, parents, and schools are also challenged to place greater value on actual learning than on the appearance of exceptional results.
For the minister’s warning to have practical effect, the central question is not simply how many candidates obtain nine As. It is whether those grades accurately represent what the candidates know and can demonstrate without assistance.
The credibility of the examination system ultimately depends on that distinction.
READ RELATED NEWS UPDATES
JAMB probes 6,458 high-tech exam malpractice cases
WAEC withholds 2,577 results for malpractice
Parents fuel exam malpractice, says Oloyede
JAMB bars Colleges of Education from admitting degree students
