A “Welcome to Lagos State” sign erected along the disputed Yakoyo–Ojodu corridor has reignited a territorial disagreement between neighbouring communities as Ifo Local Council demands an evidence-based boundary determination before competing claims deepen public confusion.
The Chairman of Ifo Local Council in Ogun State, Kusimo Idris Olalekan, has challenged the erection of a signpost declaring the area part of Lagos State, calling on the Lagos Government to restrain officials of Ojodu Local Council pending clarification of the boundary.
The signpost stands along Yakoyo–Ojodu Road, around Yakoyo in Isheri-Ojodu Ward, an area Ifo Council claims falls within Ogun State. Olalekan said the display could mislead residents and motorists about which state exercises lawful authority over the location.
The dispute extends beyond a roadside marker. Questions over territorial boundaries can affect local administration, road ownership, public infrastructure, planning approvals and the delivery of services to residents.
Until the boundary is established through recognised records, competing claims risk creating uncertainty over which authorities should exercise jurisdiction.
RELATED NEWS:
Road construction adds to the dispute
According to Ifo Council, tensions around the corridor have persisted for years, with the latest disagreement emerging amid claims over territory following road construction by the Ogun State Government under Governor Dapo Abiodun.
The council accused Lagos of repeatedly attempting to assert authority over locations it considers part of Ogun. These allegations have not been independently established, and the account supplied contains no response from the Lagos State Government or Ojodu council leadership.
The signpost’s erection does not, by itself, establish the legal boundary. Equally, Ifo Council’s assertion does not conclusively determine ownership. An authoritative resolution requires evidence capable of distinguishing administrative claims from legally recognised territorial limits.
Official records hold the key
Ifo Council has called for a review of government documents, approved surveys and other relevant records to establish the precise boundary between the two states. It also appealed for restraint while the matter is addressed through appropriate channels.
A credible settlement would need to identify the applicable boundary instruments, reconcile any conflicting survey information and clarify the jurisdiction of the affected communities. Any agreed outcome should also be communicated clearly to residents, businesses and road users who may be uncertain about the authority responsible for the area.
The issue carries practical consequences for people living along the corridor. Uncertainty over jurisdiction can complicate complaints, permits, infrastructure maintenance and access to public services, particularly where neighbouring councils exercise overlapping claims.
Neither the full legal basis of the competing positions nor an official joint boundary review was provided in the available account. The next significant step is therefore not another signpost, but a documented determination accepted by the relevant authorities.
Until that process produces clarity, the Yakoyo–Ojodu dispute remains a test of how Lagos and Ogun manage shared boundaries without allowing local claims to escalate into a prolonged administrative confrontation.
For More News Updates, Visit New Daily Prime News
