Special Reports

Trump’s Iran Deal Sparks Anger Among Republican Hawks

US President Donald Trump’s deal with Iran has opened a rare breach with Republican hawks, who warn that the agree­ment falls far short of the sweeping victory he prom­ised and could leave Teh­ran richer, stronger and still able to threaten the region.

The memorandum of understanding, signed by Trump in France, is aimed at ending months of conflict, reopening the vital Strait of Hormuz and stabilizing energy markets after a war that drove up oil prices and raised fears of a wider Middle East crisis.

But the terms have alarmed some of the same Republicans who spent years denouncing Demo­cratic former President Barack Obama’s 2015 nu­clear agreement with Iran as dangerously weak.

They have voiced con­cerns that Trump is offer­ing Iran sanctions relief, access to oil markets and the prospect of a $300 bil­lion reconstruction fund while failing to secure firm commitments on uranium enrichment, ballistic mis­siles or Tehran’s support for armed proxies.

Republican Senator Bill Cassidy wrote on X that former president and Republican icon Ronald Reagan would be “rolling over in his grave,” calling the agreement “the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.”

“Before the war, the strait was open, Iran was being crushed by sanc­tions, and 13 service mem­bers were still alive,” he said. “Now, 13 Americans are dead, families have paid billions at the pump, sanctions will be lifted, and the bombing has stopped.”

Trump has defended the deal as a practical way to reopen one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints, through which about a fifth of glob­al crude normally passes. He said the agreement was not final and warned that the United States could resume strikes if negotia­tions fail.

“It’s a memorandum of understanding, and if I don’t like it, we’ll go back to shooting at them, dropping bombs on their head,” Trump told report­ers Wednesday at a Group of Seven summit in Evian, in eastern France.

But the president also appeared to lower his ear­lier demands, after having called during the war for Iran’s “total surrender” and the dismantling of its nuclear programme.

Under the memoran­dum, Iran is expected to keep the Strait of Hormuz open during a 60-day nego­tiating period and receive sanctions waivers allowing it to sell oil while talks con­tinue.

The deal restates Iran’s pledge not to seek a nu­clear weapon but does not require an immediate halt to enrichment or the sur­render of highly enriched uranium stockpiles.

Republican Senator Ted Cruz urged Trump not to “suddenly come in with massive buckets of cash to let them rebuild and be­come a threat to America again.”

“I don’t want to see theo­cratic Islamists who want to kill us made stronger. So if this deal is giving them $300 billion, that’s a mis­take,” he said.

Texas Senator John Cornyn told reporters he was concerned the accord could be little more than “an intermission,” leav­ing Iran able to rebuild its arsenal and keep enriching uranium.

Senate Majority Lead­er John Thune was more cautious but said lawmak­ers needed answers on whether the agreement addressed Iran’s nuclear programme, ballistic mis­siles and support for mili­tant groups.

Senator Lindsey Gra­ham said the deal opened the Strait of Hormuz, suspended hostilities and created space to test whether diplomacy could curb Iran’s nuclear ambi­tions.

“I doubt if they can, on the nuclear programme, but why not try?” Graham said, according to The Hill.

Democrats, who are united in opposition to the deal, argue that Trump launched a costly war only to accept a deal that largely restores the pre-war status quo while handing Tehran new leverage.

Trump, meanwhile, has lashed out at critics, dis­missing opponents of the deal as “fools” and insist­ing it gives Washington a chance to end the war with­out deeper US involvement.

You Might Be Interested In

Back to top button