Chief Julius Bokoru, the Special Assistant on Media and Public Affairs to former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Chief Timipre Sylva, has questioned the circumstances surrounding reports linking his principal to an alleged plot against President Bola Tinubu’s administration.
Bokoru said the manner in which the allegations had been repeatedly reported raised serious questions about the sources of the information and the motive behind the continuous publication of the claims.
The aide spoke in a statement issued amid growing attention to reports concerning Sylva and an alleged plan to overthrow the Federal Government.
He said his comments should not be interpreted as an attempt to undermine investigative journalism or prevent the media from scrutinising public officials.
Rather, Bokoru urged journalists to examine the origin of information supplied to them, especially when the materials involve sensitive security investigations.
“Nigerian journalism has, at its best, played a courageous and indispensable role in holding governments, institutions and powerful individuals to account.”
He, however, said the reporting of the allegations against Sylva appeared to have moved beyond investigation into what he described as a repeated effort to establish one particular narrative.
“The allegations have been repeatedly serialised, repackaged and amplified in a manner that increasingly gives the impression of a deliberate campaign to cement a particular narrative in the public mind,” he stated.
Bokoru said he had not been able to establish contact with Sylva since the controversy started.
He nevertheless maintained that the absence of direct communication with his principal would not stop him from raising questions about the manner in which information concerning the former Bayelsa State governor was being released.
He particularly questioned the source and timing of documents reportedly used in some of the reports.
“Where are these materials coming from? Who is supplying them? Why are sensitive investigative documents appearing in carefully sequenced instalments?
“And why does virtually every new report seem calculated to reinforce the same conclusion about Sylva, even though the allegations have yet to be established in court?”
The development followed earlier reports that security operatives had raided Sylva’s Abuja residence while investigating an alleged coup plot.
Bokoru had previously confirmed that the residence was raided by individuals believed to be operatives of the Defence Headquarters.
He also said the operation caused considerable damage to the property. Sylva was outside Nigeria at the time, according to his aide.
Bokoru, however, has consistently denied that his principal had any involvement in a plan to remove Tinubu from office.
In his latest statement, he was more focused on the media coverage of the matter and the danger of presenting allegations as established facts.
“I will say plainly that the pattern of this coverage increasingly raises the uncomfortable question of whether some organisations are pursuing their own stories or, knowingly or otherwise, acting from someone else’s script,” he said.
He stressed that he was not accusing any media organisation of receiving instructions or funding from a particular person or group.
According to him, he had no evidence to make such an accusation.
His concern, he said, was whether journalists were independently verifying the information being handed to them before publication.
Bokoru also drew a distinction between an allegation contained in an investigative document and a finding that has been established through the courts.
“There is also a fundamental distinction that should never be blurred: an allegation is not evidence; an investigator’s theory is not a conviction; and a statement contained in an investigative file is not a judicial finding of guilt,” he said.
He therefore challenged authorities with evidence against Sylva to follow due process and present any prosecutable case before a court.
“If there are allegations, report them as allegations,” Bokoru insisted.
The aide further warned against what he described as the trial of individuals through the media.
He said continuous publication of unproven allegations could create a situation where public opinion becomes the judge, despite the absence of cross-examination and other safeguards available in a court of law.
“The more troubling possibility is that confidential investigative materials may be selectively finding their way into the media in order to shape public opinion,” he said.
Bokoru said media organisations should be careful not to become instruments for interests seeking to influence public perception.
What do you think about this?
Drop your opinion in the comment section.
FOLLOW US & Share this with someone who needs to see this.
