IGP Disu Not Against Nigerians Recording Officers, Police Clarifies

The Nigeria Police Force has clarified that Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Olatunji Disu is not opposed to citizens recording police officers while they perform their duties in public.
The Force New Media Officer, Aliyu Giwa, said Disu’s concern was with the misuse of such recordings, particularly when encounters between police officers and members of the public are deliberately turned into social media content.
Giwa made the clarification in a series of posts on X on Saturday, following criticism of the IGP’s recent remarks on Nigerians filming police officers.
He said the police were not seeking to prevent legitimate scrutiny or deny citizens their rights, stressing that responsible recordings could promote accountability and also protect officers against false allegations.
“The IGP’s concern is not to shield Police officers from accountability or deny citizens their rights. Instead, it focuses on the misuse of recordings, especially when officers are provoked, ridiculed, filmed for entertainment, or subjected to unnecessary intrusion while performing their duties,” Giwa said.
He urged Nigerians to distinguish between documenting police activities responsibly and deliberately exploiting encounters with officers for social media content.
“It is important to distinguish between responsible documentation and the deliberate exploitation of Police encounters for social media content,” he said.
Giwa noted that recordings could provide evidence when officers were accused of misconduct and also assist investigations.
“As a public institution, the Police must remain open to legitimate scrutiny. Evidence is essential when an officer acts improperly. Similarly, responsible recording can protect officers from false allegations and support investigations,” he said.
He, however, stressed that police officers remained entitled to basic rights despite their official responsibilities.
“However, wearing the uniform does not remove an officer’s right to dignity or privacy,” Giwa said.
Giwa also maintained that Disu’s comments should not be interpreted as a blanket rejection of citizens filming police officers.
“While you are allowed to interpret it as you see fit, the message from the IGP was concerning the misuse of recordings, not a general rejection of legitimate documentation or accountability,” Giwa said.
He disclosed that body cameras were also being considered as part of broader efforts to promote accountable policing.
“Body cameras are, in fact, part of the broader conversation about modern, accountable policing, and they can protect both citizens and officers,” he said.
The clarification followed a recent courtesy visit by the leadership of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) to Disu at the Force Headquarters in Abuja, where the issue of recording police officers was discussed.
During the meeting, Disu had expressed concern about Nigerians recording police officers, particularly for social media skits, describing the practice as “very, very demoralising” for members of the Force.
The IGP, however, acknowledged that citizens had the right to record officers performing their duties in public.
“We are not saying they cannot exercise their rights of recording officers in the public places while doing their jobs,” Disu said.
“But they should put restraints and not turn our police officers to content for their skits or anything,” he added.







