Thousands of Nigerian and other overseas care workers living in Britain could be spared a proposed 15-year wait for permanent residency as the UK government prepares to soften controversial immigration reforms following mounting opposition from senior Labour politicians.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is expected to announce changes to the government’s indefinite leave to remain (ILR) proposals during the week beginning 2 November 2026. The decision could protect existing migrant care workers from having their path to permanent settlement extended by another decade.
According to the BBC’s report published on Saturday, 31 October, ministers are considering exempting social care workers already living in Britain from the longer qualifying period.
However, the exemption has not been formally confirmed, and it remains unclear whether all eligible care workers would retain the existing five-year route to settlement.
For many Nigerians who moved to Britain to work in care homes and community healthcare services, the decision could determine when they become eligible to live and work permanently in the country without further visa sponsorship.
Why the government is reconsidering the 15-year ILR rule
The proposed changes form part of the Labour government’s plans to introduce an earned-settlement system, under which migrants would have to demonstrate sustained contributions to British society before qualifying for permanent residence.
Under the proposals published by the Home Office in November 2025, the standard qualifying period for many migrants would double from five to 10 years.
Certain lower-paid workers, particularly those sponsored for jobs below degree level, could face a 15-year qualifying period.
The government originally proposed applying the changes to migrants already in Britain who had not received indefinite leave to remain.
That provision generated opposition because many affected workers entered the UK expecting to become eligible for settlement after five years, provided they satisfied immigration requirements.
Critics argue that extending the waiting period after migrants have already moved to Britain would undermine their long-term plans and create uncertainty for families and employers.
The Home Office’s earned-settlement consultation confirms that the government considered a 15-year settlement period for lower-skilled sponsored workers and sought views on transitional protections.
How the immigration changes could affect Nigerian care workers
The potential exemption is particularly important for Nigerians who entered Britain through the Health and Care Worker visa route from 2022 onwards.
Many of these workers are approaching the point when they would become eligible for permanent residency under the existing five-year system.
For example, a Nigerian care worker who began a qualifying visa route in July 2022 might become eligible to apply for ILR in 2027.
Under a 10-year qualifying period, that could move to 2032. Under a 15-year requirement, the date could shift to 2037.
The practical consequences could extend beyond the length of residence.
Workers who must renew their visas for additional years may face further application fees and Immigration Health Surcharge costs where applicable. Some Health and Care Worker visa holders are exempt from that surcharge.
Longer periods without settlement could also affect employment mobility, family arrangements and financial planning.
Importantly, extending a qualifying period would not automatically mean a worker must remain with the same employer throughout that period. Employment rights and visa conditions would continue to depend on the applicable immigration route.
Labour opposition puts pressure on Mahmood
The proposed restrictions have generated disagreements within the Labour Party, with senior politicians questioning whether changes should apply to migrants who had already built their lives in Britain.
Angela Rayner has been among the most prominent critics.
She previously described retrospective changes affecting existing care workers as “un-British”, arguing that people who came to the country in good faith should not have the conditions of their settlement unexpectedly changed.
The dispute is particularly sensitive because Britain continues to depend on overseas workers in adult social care.
Ministers must balance efforts to reduce long-term migration with concerns about recruitment, retention and stability in services supporting older and vulnerable people.
A report by The Guardian on 21 October described growing pressure within Labour to reconsider the proposed settlement restrictions.
Who could still face a 10-year wait?
While social care workers already in Britain may receive special protection, the government is expected to retain its proposed 10-year standard settlement period for many other migrant workers.
The earned-settlement model would also allow some applicants to qualify earlier based on factors such as earnings and recognised contributions.
However, the government has not yet confirmed the complete conditions for accelerated settlement.
This means that Nigerians working in technology, engineering, finance, education and other sectors should not assume that an exemption for care workers would automatically apply to them.
Equally, the proposed 10-year period should not be treated as existing law until the necessary Immigration Rules have been changed.
The government must also clarify whether migrants who are close to completing five years of residence will receive transitional protection.
That decision could be important for people who have already paid visa fees, relocated family members and made long-term financial commitments based on the existing settlement system.
Government predicts 1.6 million settlement grants by 2030
The debate comes as the Home Office prepares for a substantial increase in the number of migrants becoming eligible for permanent settlement.
Government projections published in the earned-settlement consultation estimate that approximately 1.6 million people could receive settlement between 2026 and 2030 under the existing policy assumptions.
Annual settlement grants were projected to peak at around 450,000 in 2028.
These figures are government forecasts, not confirmed approvals or estimates of the number of people who will be affected by the proposed exemptions.
The Home Office argues that a contribution-based settlement system would strengthen integration and ensure that long-term residence reflects migrants’ economic and social participation.
Opponents warn that longer waiting periods could discourage workers from remaining in essential sectors and expose families to prolonged immigration uncertainty.
What happens next for UK immigration rules?
The government is expected to present its decisions to Parliament during the first week of November.
A consultation on the proposed changes attracted approximately 200,000 responses, according to the BBC.
The Home Office has declined to confirm its final position before the announcement.
The most important questions awaiting clarification include which existing care workers would qualify for protection, whether the five-year route would be preserved, how dependants would be treated and when the revised requirements would begin.
Any announced reforms must be reflected in the applicable legal framework before they can change settlement eligibility.
Read related news from NewDailyPrime:
Andy Burnham may exempt care workers from the proposed 15-year ILR route
UK immigration crackdown sparks industry alarm, family hardship
UK foreign workers face a 10-year wait for settled status
